Tuesday, April 15, 2014

IDEA FOR POPULATION CONTROL


SOME INTUITIVE IDEA, POSING AS SUGGESTIONS TO THE POWERS THAT BE...

GOING FORWARD, DO WE SEE A SYSTEM WHEREIN :-

THERE COULD BE IMPLICIT POPULATION CONTROL BY MEANS OF DIFFERENTIAL 
TAXATION BASED ON THE NUMBER OF BIOLOGICAL OFFSPRING(S) ONE FATHERS OR
MOTHERS ?

IS THERE A POSSIBILITY THAT THE NUMBER OF KIDS ONE HAS IS LINKED TO : -

A) ANY / ALL GOVT RELATED SCHEMES / PROGRAMS ONE MIGHT BE ENTITLED TO ?
THIS INCLUDES THE COUPLE - HUSBAND & WIFE DUO AS ALSO THE OFFSPRING.

B) THE KIND OF DIFFERENTIAL ENTITLEMENT THE KIDS GET, WHILE GROWING UP ?
AS ALSO, WHILE IN SERVICE OR EVEN OTHERWISE IN HIS / HER OCCUPATION / VOCATION ?

THIS -> AS A PROHIBITIVE DETERRENT AGAINST POPULATION EXPLOSION.
HOW EFFECTIVE THIS MIGHT BE ?

FEW QUESTIONS -
- SOME "PRIVILEGE FACTOR" MUST BE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE "NUMBER OF KIDS" ONE HAS?

- OFFSPRING(S) - ADOPTED OR BIOLOGICAL ?

- MORE THE NUMBER OF KIDS THE GOVT.-DENOMINATED "PRIVILEGE FACTOR" IN ANY
/ ALL FORMS IS BASICALLY TAPERED DOWN.

FEWER OFFSPRING(S) ENTITLES FOR MORE GOVT. SOPS FOR THE PARENTS AS WELL AS
KIDS, GOING FORWARD...


INCOME TAXATION AS WELL AS GOVT. SUBSIDY TO BE GIVEN BASED ON THE NUMBER
OF BIOLOGICAL OFFSPRING(S)...

BASICALLY, SOMETHING ON THE LINES OF ( JUST TO GIVE AN IDEA ) -

1) ONE PERSON ( MAN / WOMAN ) -> 70 % TAX RELIEF => 30 % TAX BURDEN

2) TWO PERSON ( MAN + WOMAN ) -> 72 % TAX RELIEF => 28 % TAX BURDEN

3) THREE PERSON ( HUSBAND + WIFE + 1 CHILD ) -> 70 % TAX RELIEF => 30 % TAX BURDEN

4) FOUR  PERSON ( HUSBAND + WIFE + 2 CHILD ) -> 67 % TAX RELIEF => 33 % TAX BURDEN

5) FIVE  PERSON ( HUSBAND + WIFE + 3 CHILD ) -> 64 % TAX RELIEF => 36 % TAX BURDEN

6) SIX   PERSON ( HUSBAND + WIFE + 3 CHILD ) -> 61 % TAX RELIEF => 39 % TAX BURDEN

...

LET'S TAKE A VERY SIMPLE EXAMPLE HERE -
THIS SAME POLICY MAY BE DETERMINING WHO ALL GETS THE LPG CYLINDER AT WHAT ALL RATE,  WHETHER -

INR 450, OR
INR 550, OR
INR 650, OR
INR 700 ...

BASICALLY A DETERRENT MEASURE.  HOW WELL THIS MIGHT BE RECEIVED / ENFORCED REMAINS TO BE SEEN.

__________________________________________________________________________________

SOME NOTES HERE -

- OUTSTANDING CHILDREN GET THE BEST BENEFITS. OTHERS HAVE TO MAKE DO.

- MORE SOPS FOR GIRL CHILD THAN A MALE CHILD ? HOW FEASIBLE.

- THIS POLICY COULD WELL BE ENFORCED ANYTIME, AT LEAST SOME 8-9 MONTHS
LATER FROM THE TIME OF PUBLICATION OF THIS POST ? SAY - 15TH JANUARY, 2015.

__________________________________________________________________________________

No comments:

Post a Comment