Many set of people from South Asia maintain their ancestry/ genealogical records.
This includes their family history, records of familial ties, etc. for hundreds or perhaps even several tens of hundreds of years or perhaps even... thousands of years.
This is a practice endemic in several caste groups in India as well.
Say among the Hindus- amongst Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Rajputs, some Kayasthas and some Vaish, as well.
This practice might be found even so amongst certain people amongst the Muslims.
Who ALL might well know their pre-Islam origins.
More so, in case... they are actually Muslims who have been formerly Hindus in any of the above-mentioned categories.
They might very well ( mostly ) know their family history. When their family moved over to Islam ( from Hinduism ). And... under what circumstances... whether it was by sops or by force of swords or by personal choice.
IMPORTANTLY...
In India...
Even if a Muslim individual DOES NOT or MAY NOT know his exact ancestry details.
There are people entrenched in the sub-continent's society who track ALL this data/ details pretty meticulously.
MOOT IDEA IS WHY ? WHY PEOPLE HAVE SO MUCH INTEREST IN ANCESTRY AND THE FAMILY ROOTS ?
FACTUALLY SPEAKING, THAT IS INHERENT IN THE INDIAN DNA.
In this regards, recalling that I read in some newspaper few years back, that...
late BAL Thackeray ( a CKP ) ancestry was traced back to Magadhan empire ( now- Bihar ), to nearly/ some TWO THOUSAND years back. And... how his ancestors wound their way thru' M.P. to land in Maharashtra. Mumbai.
...
Now, amongst Muslims in the sub-continent... generally... sheikhs, saiyyads, dars, ranas, khans, etc. might mostly know their point of change-over and in some/ many occasions they will know the Hindu families that are currently existing from the self same family tree. And/ or, vice-versa.
They might have covert engagement, as well. This remains an IN-DENIABLE FACT.
THEY KNOW THEIR ROOTS. PERIOD.
...
Now, these people can be in India or Pakistan or Bangladesh or Nepal.
There are historical and ancestral ties still held and cherished by people where in they know their exact familial counterparts across the border(s).
( Whether - India-Nepal, India-Pakistan or India-Bangladesh )
IMPORTANT FACT...
Religion and nationalities could be different. Still there could be a covertly underlying current of filial bondings between two sets of people separated by religion and the national boundaries.
Eg. -
1) recall BJP leader Jaswant Singh praising MA Jinnah just because Jinnah had confirmed Rajput ancestry.
2) recently "Chief" threatening to expose UP politico Azaam Khan's family background/ history/ ancestry on his tanker nee blog.
3) The Sheikhs of Bangladesh have Brahmin ancestry ( an origin/ deflection point NOT any more than 100-500 years old ).
...
Till some decades back... in the Indian sub-continent there have been instances of people of the same family tree living in a village ( say ) but belonging to two different faiths- as Hindus and Muslims.
This is even possible to be observed today.
Else/ also...
Once they migrate over to different areas... still they may or may not stay in contact.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE -
Since the Mughal times... the Muslims have very close contacts/ relations with Rajputs and Kayasthas from the Hindu society. And, these ties endure... particularly so in the formerly North Indian territories of undivided India.
Now... lots and lots of the leadership in Pakistan are from Kshatriya / Rajput ancestry.
The Punjabi Muslims call the shots in Pakistani establishment and the armed forces.
And, they want to maintain status quo... on this front. No matter how... and... how-so-ever.
For them other/ alternate power centers is an anathema.
Recall the plight of Mojahirs who are treated as out-siders. What, if they were, but, Punjabi sunni rather than Bihari muslims ?
( Similar situation in India... where specific caste-groups have maintained hold over the net/ effective rule at New Delhi. NO matter how. And... how-so-ever. And, they are NOT letting go... Anyhow... )
Now... this is well known that...
Many Hindu as well as Muslim families have enduring roots and ties across the border.
SO NOT ACTUALLY IMPLYING ANYTHING...
But... in the armed forces setup ( THIS IS BUT ONE, NOT TO BE IGNORED, POSSIBILITY ) someone tells another one across the border...
"JANAAB, UDHAR SE GOLI... CHALAANE-KA" ( Meaning -> Bro' fire some shots from your side )
The counterpart ( other-side )...
"NAHIN SIR JEE !! GOLI KYON, GOLA BHEJTA HOON NA"
( Meaning -> NO Sir ! Why few bullets; we'll send across heavy ammo or mortars !! )
Now... does this ring a bell ?
...
In such a ( hypothetical ) situation...
no one knows who started this goli/ gola thing ? They blame each other.
Blame game. Anytime. Every time.
In the future also this will repeat, for sure. Every time.
POINT TO MAKE -
Writing to draw attention of our current army chief.
Who incidentally MUST know, understand and appreciate that if I had NOT objected to non-appointment of the army chief just because of EC strictures/ stipulations prior/ during the LS polls in 2014.
Then... in all probability he WOULD NOT have been an army chief in case the matter were to be decided by the current NDA govt. post May, 2014 polls.
For sure, these people would have appointed someone else. In this context I do STILL recall that one politician who went on to become a cabinet rank minister had vehemently opposed appointment of the army chief by the UPA regime.
Way... much ahead of the polls... whilst the EC strictures were in place.
As...these NDA people wanted to put their handpicked person at the top. Their own people.
And... that would have meant that we would have been seeing some one else heading the Indian Army.
Am sure on this.
JUST MAKING A SMALL YET A VERY VERY CRITICAL POINT HERE. PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO AGREE ON THIS.
IMPORTANTLY and INCIDENTALLY...
Any army chief, in a situation of imposed Emergency leading to martial rule/ law can choose to be hand in glove with the ruling dispensation.
Else, the army chief can choose to be pretty much HIS own boss along with the armed forces top brass at the helm.
An idea NOT to be ruled out in the current situation of global conflicts and simmering economic crises.
And, the possibility of an internally triggered or externally foisted false flag ( FF ).
Am I NOT correct ??
...
POINT TO MAKE HERE...
Having said that... the reason I mention this instance is for the Chiefs in the armed forces to understand... appreciate... and... internalize way too well that WE MUST have a pretty well diversified and some sort of NON-homogeneousness in the make of the strategic postings/ deployments in the armed forces and as also in the intel agencies. A MUST.
( Something... I believe might be lacking as of today. MUST need be addressed. This poses a security threat of sorts, to the nation. What I DO imply - MUST be pretty well understood. Given the context. )
It MUST NOT be possible for potentially well entrenched "malignant" elements to start off the goli/ gola thing so that a few set of people have planned/ schemed and want to -
a) divert attention,
b) seek attention or re-attention; most important of all
c) seek to gain political mileage out of the people's suffering !!
[ What I ACTUALLY need to imply MUST be real apparent. Given the context, I am implying. ]
... the underlying politics in this all.
BOTTOM LINE -
Would request the army chief and/ or the Chiefs to make requisite changes. ELSE, perhaps make STRICT
recommendations in his records. Changes to be instituted ASAP, down the line, in principle.
Lest we are mutually confronted with false operations/ false flag !!
Any potentially entrenched malignant elements ( akin to a Judases / "TAKSHAK" ) can start, whether or NOT instigated by the other end.
Talking of risk mitigation here. Prevention... not cure.
All this...
EoF ( End.Of.File )
This includes their family history, records of familial ties, etc. for hundreds or perhaps even several tens of hundreds of years or perhaps even... thousands of years.
This is a practice endemic in several caste groups in India as well.
Say among the Hindus- amongst Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Rajputs, some Kayasthas and some Vaish, as well.
This practice might be found even so amongst certain people amongst the Muslims.
Who ALL might well know their pre-Islam origins.
More so, in case... they are actually Muslims who have been formerly Hindus in any of the above-mentioned categories.
They might very well ( mostly ) know their family history. When their family moved over to Islam ( from Hinduism ). And... under what circumstances... whether it was by sops or by force of swords or by personal choice.
IMPORTANTLY...
In India...
Even if a Muslim individual DOES NOT or MAY NOT know his exact ancestry details.
There are people entrenched in the sub-continent's society who track ALL this data/ details pretty meticulously.
MOOT IDEA IS WHY ? WHY PEOPLE HAVE SO MUCH INTEREST IN ANCESTRY AND THE FAMILY ROOTS ?
FACTUALLY SPEAKING, THAT IS INHERENT IN THE INDIAN DNA.
In this regards, recalling that I read in some newspaper few years back, that...
late BAL Thackeray ( a CKP ) ancestry was traced back to Magadhan empire ( now- Bihar ), to nearly/ some TWO THOUSAND years back. And... how his ancestors wound their way thru' M.P. to land in Maharashtra. Mumbai.
...
Now, amongst Muslims in the sub-continent... generally... sheikhs, saiyyads, dars, ranas, khans, etc. might mostly know their point of change-over and in some/ many occasions they will know the Hindu families that are currently existing from the self same family tree. And/ or, vice-versa.
They might have covert engagement, as well. This remains an IN-DENIABLE FACT.
THEY KNOW THEIR ROOTS. PERIOD.
...
Now, these people can be in India or Pakistan or Bangladesh or Nepal.
There are historical and ancestral ties still held and cherished by people where in they know their exact familial counterparts across the border(s).
( Whether - India-Nepal, India-Pakistan or India-Bangladesh )
IMPORTANT FACT...
Religion and nationalities could be different. Still there could be a covertly underlying current of filial bondings between two sets of people separated by religion and the national boundaries.
Eg. -
1) recall BJP leader Jaswant Singh praising MA Jinnah just because Jinnah had confirmed Rajput ancestry.
2) recently "Chief" threatening to expose UP politico Azaam Khan's family background/ history/ ancestry on his tanker nee blog.
3) The Sheikhs of Bangladesh have Brahmin ancestry ( an origin/ deflection point NOT any more than 100-500 years old ).
...
Till some decades back... in the Indian sub-continent there have been instances of people of the same family tree living in a village ( say ) but belonging to two different faiths- as Hindus and Muslims.
This is even possible to be observed today.
Else/ also...
Once they migrate over to different areas... still they may or may not stay in contact.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE -
Since the Mughal times... the Muslims have very close contacts/ relations with Rajputs and Kayasthas from the Hindu society. And, these ties endure... particularly so in the formerly North Indian territories of undivided India.
Now... lots and lots of the leadership in Pakistan are from Kshatriya / Rajput ancestry.
The Punjabi Muslims call the shots in Pakistani establishment and the armed forces.
And, they want to maintain status quo... on this front. No matter how... and... how-so-ever.
For them other/ alternate power centers is an anathema.
Recall the plight of Mojahirs who are treated as out-siders. What, if they were, but, Punjabi sunni rather than Bihari muslims ?
( Similar situation in India... where specific caste-groups have maintained hold over the net/ effective rule at New Delhi. NO matter how. And... how-so-ever. And, they are NOT letting go... Anyhow... )
Now... this is well known that...
Many Hindu as well as Muslim families have enduring roots and ties across the border.
SO NOT ACTUALLY IMPLYING ANYTHING...
But... in the armed forces setup ( THIS IS BUT ONE, NOT TO BE IGNORED, POSSIBILITY ) someone tells another one across the border...
"JANAAB, UDHAR SE GOLI... CHALAANE-KA" ( Meaning -> Bro' fire some shots from your side )
The counterpart ( other-side )...
"NAHIN SIR JEE !! GOLI KYON, GOLA BHEJTA HOON NA"
( Meaning -> NO Sir ! Why few bullets; we'll send across heavy ammo or mortars !! )
Now... does this ring a bell ?
...
In such a ( hypothetical ) situation...
no one knows who started this goli/ gola thing ? They blame each other.
Blame game. Anytime. Every time.
In the future also this will repeat, for sure. Every time.
POINT TO MAKE -
Writing to draw attention of our current army chief.
Who incidentally MUST know, understand and appreciate that if I had NOT objected to non-appointment of the army chief just because of EC strictures/ stipulations prior/ during the LS polls in 2014.
Then... in all probability he WOULD NOT have been an army chief in case the matter were to be decided by the current NDA govt. post May, 2014 polls.
For sure, these people would have appointed someone else. In this context I do STILL recall that one politician who went on to become a cabinet rank minister had vehemently opposed appointment of the army chief by the UPA regime.
Way... much ahead of the polls... whilst the EC strictures were in place.
As...these NDA people wanted to put their handpicked person at the top. Their own people.
And... that would have meant that we would have been seeing some one else heading the Indian Army.
Am sure on this.
JUST MAKING A SMALL YET A VERY VERY CRITICAL POINT HERE. PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO AGREE ON THIS.
IMPORTANTLY and INCIDENTALLY...
Any army chief, in a situation of imposed Emergency leading to martial rule/ law can choose to be hand in glove with the ruling dispensation.
Else, the army chief can choose to be pretty much HIS own boss along with the armed forces top brass at the helm.
An idea NOT to be ruled out in the current situation of global conflicts and simmering economic crises.
And, the possibility of an internally triggered or externally foisted false flag ( FF ).
Am I NOT correct ??
...
POINT TO MAKE HERE...
Having said that... the reason I mention this instance is for the Chiefs in the armed forces to understand... appreciate... and... internalize way too well that WE MUST have a pretty well diversified and some sort of NON-homogeneousness in the make of the strategic postings/ deployments in the armed forces and as also in the intel agencies. A MUST.
( Something... I believe might be lacking as of today. MUST need be addressed. This poses a security threat of sorts, to the nation. What I DO imply - MUST be pretty well understood. Given the context. )
It MUST NOT be possible for potentially well entrenched "malignant" elements to start off the goli/ gola thing so that a few set of people have planned/ schemed and want to -
a) divert attention,
b) seek attention or re-attention; most important of all
c) seek to gain political mileage out of the people's suffering !!
[ What I ACTUALLY need to imply MUST be real apparent. Given the context, I am implying. ]
... the underlying politics in this all.
BOTTOM LINE -
Would request the army chief and/ or the Chiefs to make requisite changes. ELSE, perhaps make STRICT
recommendations in his records. Changes to be instituted ASAP, down the line, in principle.
Lest we are mutually confronted with false operations/ false flag !!
Any potentially entrenched malignant elements ( akin to a Judases / "TAKSHAK" ) can start, whether or NOT instigated by the other end.
Talking of risk mitigation here. Prevention... not cure.
All this...
EoF ( End.Of.File )
No comments:
Post a Comment